No solution to the climate or biodiversity crisis without protecting the rights of Indigenous People

By Malini Morzaria

Indigenous Peoples who attended COP 26 in Scotland are concerned that the 26th global climate summit did not go far enough in protecting the rights of those that have been in the frontline of defending nature.  Some local communities slammed the gathering as an illusion or more empty promises in the commitment to end deforestation by 2030 without concrete actions

Human rights and environmental organisations[i] said the decisions made at COP 26 will not stop the daily abuses faced by the defenders of the world’s primary forests and could lead to a reduction in the rights of indigenous people, including losing their lands without their consent.

“Four environmental defenders a week are being killed because they stand up for the right to their lands and to protect the nature that we came to COP to struggle to find solutions for – we need to get our act together.” H.E. Per Olsson Fridh, Minister for International Development Cooperation, Swedish Ministry for Foreign Affairs, said at a side event Two crises, one nature-based solution “ We are failing to protect those that are getting this right.”

Indigenous Peoples hold over 80 percent of the world’s biodiversity and are widely accepted as being at the heart of the solutions.  Yet local communities had the smallest representation where global leaders met in Scotland to discuss how to address climate change.

“Without the participation of Indigenous Peoples, there will be no solution. World leaders need to understand once and for all that we, Indigenous Peoples, are the spokespeople for Mother Earth. And Mother Earth is screaming, Mother Earth is attacking.” Sônia Guajajara, the executive coordinator the Articulation of Indigenous Peoples of Brazil said at an event Net zero smoke and mirrors, a story of betrayal: making the case against carbon market offsetting

Unconstrained industrial and agricultural exploitation of forests – the lungs of the world – are besieging local communities’ defences against illegal incursions and biodiversity loss.

“What is causing pandemics is the massive deforestation, the soya bean plantations, the illegal logging, the illegal mining, the big infrastructure projects like Belo Monte dams – those are causing our pandemics not the animals that come out of the forest.” Juma Xipaia, Leader of the Xipaia Community in Brazil, as a panellist for a high-level round table Two crises, one nature-based solution, said. “So, you must assume the responsibility of your consumption that destroys forests and the climate.”

New funds pledged

Donors have pledged $1.7 billion between 2021 and 2025 to “support the advancement of Indigenous Peoples’ and local communities’ forest tenure rights and greater recognition and rewards for their role as guardians of forests and nature.”  But pledges are not cash and the continued wrangling between developed and developing nations could mean that the reality is very different.

“Indigenous People are strong, they are partners, not victims or beneficiaries.  This commitment is for direct funding to the indigenous communities who have told us clearly over the last days in COP – “Give it to us directly and help us in partnership to do it better.”” Nonette Royo, Executive Director of The Tenure Facility, addressed participants of Two crises, one nature-based solution. “Land rights  is what helps Indigenous Peoples keep protecting and stopping pandemics at source.”

Research shows that deforestation rates in areas where land rights are recognised and enforced is lower by 20%.

Hindou Oumarou Ibrahim, President of the Association for Indigenous Women and Peoples of Chad,  and panellist forTwo crises, one nature-based solution was clear – building the capacity of indigenous communities was no longer relevant.  More important was that the developed nations needed their capacity built to live in harmony with nature.  Adding that if indigenous communities already manage 80% of the world’s biodiversity, they can certainly manage the money.

“The indigenous communities have been protecting the environment without money for so long and this is very important.  It is very important to have new funds for indigenous communities and for us to manage this money ourselves, but the responsibility is not only for the indigenous communities, but the responsibility is also for all of us and for you to not expect the indigenous communities to protect the forest all alone.” Xipaia concluded at the event. “We also need  your respect and your commitment.”

 

 

[i] including Amnesty International, Friends of the Earth and the Centre for International Environmental Law (CIEL)

 

Malini Morzaria is a freelance writer and multimedia content creator.  Seasoned in crisis communication, strategy, campaigns, and advocacy, she has worked with organisations like Greenpeace, Médecins Sans Frontières, ZDF TV and the European Commission.

Articles

04 August 2026

Blogs

Pourquoi les droits fonciers ne peuvent pas attendre la paix

Et si attendre la paix était l’un des plus grands obstacles à la sécurisation des droits fonciers ? Pendant des décennies, la gouvernance foncière a été largement considérée comme un élément de la reconstruction post-conflit. L’hypothèse était simple : le conflit prend fin, les institutions se redressent, les populations rentrent chez elles, et ce n’est qu’alors que les droits fonciers peuvent être rétablis. Dans de nombreuses régions du monde, cependant, cette séquence ne correspond pas à la réalité. Les conflits sont souvent prolongés, les institutions peuvent être affaiblies ou inexistantes, et les registres fonciers officiels ont parfois disparu. Pourtant, les communautés continuent de cultiver leurs terres, de gérer les forêts, de résoudre les différends et de défendre leurs territoires en s’appuyant sur les systèmes de gouvernance qui restent à leur disposition.

23 July 2026

Blogs

Why land rights can't wait for peace

What if waiting for peace is one of the biggest obstacles to securing land rights? For decades, land governance has largely been treated as part of post-conflict recovery. The assumption has been straightforward: conflict ends, institutions recover, people return home, and only then can land rights be restored. In many parts of the world, however, that sequence does not reflect reality. Conflict is often prolonged, institutions may be weakened or absent, and official land records may have disappeared. Yet communities continue farming, managing forests, resolving disputes, and defending their territories using the governance systems still available to them.

13 July 2026

Brazil

"We are the middle, the beginning and the middle." : Quilombola women in land rights and climate action

Long before a land title is granted or a policy is signed, movements are built. They are built by women and men organising communities, defending territories, passing on ancestral knowledge, protecting culture, and ensuring generations of struggle are never forgotten. Between 10 and 14 June 2026, the III Meeting of CONAQ's Quilombola Women's Collective brought hundreds of these leaders together from across Brazil, alongside representatives from Latin America and Africa. Over five days, they celebrated victories, confronted urgent challenges and strengthened a movement that continues to shape Brazil's conversations on land rights, climate justice, gender equality and historical reparation.