EU Parliament votes to broaden rules on deforestation-free products

Lawmakers vote in favour of widening the rules to stop EU banks from financing deforestation.

Recognizing that the European Union is responsible for about 10 percent of global deforestation, the EU Parliament adopted stronger anti-deforestation rules last month that ban products linked to the practice and require businesses to respect the rights of Indigenous Peoples and local communities. 

Citing the pressing need to combat climate change and biodiversity loss, lawmakers also widened the scope of the new law to include European banks. Once approved, it would oblige EU-based financial institutions to ensure they are not backing deforestation through their investments. 

report from last year by the London-based rights group Global Witness found EU-based banks making deals worth billions of euros with 20 agribusiness companies accused of deforestation between 2016 and 2020.

No specific products or countries are banned in the Parliament’s text. Instead, companies must carry out due diligence to show that goods sold in the EU have not been produced on deforested or degraded lands. Commodities like charcoal, cocoa, coffee, palm-oil, rubber, wood and paper products as well as meat from livestock – all key drivers of deforestation around the globe –  are covered by the regulation.

The rules also bolster protections for Indigenous Peoples and local communities by fully recognizing the important role they play in protecting forests. In addition, businesses should obtain the free, prior and informed consent of indigenous groups before moving forward with any projects that could affect their community. 

Indigenous Peoples and local communities reside in and manage some of the most important and fragile forested areas on earth. But many have seen their territories decimated by agricultural expansion, logging, mining and infrastructure projects. The UN Food and Agriculture Organization has estimated that globally an area larger than the EU was cut down from 1990 to 2020. 

The EU Parliament also adopted several amendments highlighting the role women play as stakeholders in partnerships and cooperation. Though concerns have been raised about how the draft legislation could hinder  or marginalise women, who make up a large part of agricultural labour especially in food production from small-scale farming systems.

The EU’s push to keep corporate supply chains deforestation-free could help stem this loss and serve as an example for others on how to strengthen indigenous rights and prevent money from funding projects linked to deforestation. 

Before it can take effect, the Parliament must negotiate the final text of the law with EU member states and the European Commission.

Articles

04 August 2026

Blogs

Pourquoi les droits fonciers ne peuvent pas attendre la paix

Et si attendre la paix était l’un des plus grands obstacles à la sécurisation des droits fonciers ? Pendant des décennies, la gouvernance foncière a été largement considérée comme un élément de la reconstruction post-conflit. L’hypothèse était simple : le conflit prend fin, les institutions se redressent, les populations rentrent chez elles, et ce n’est qu’alors que les droits fonciers peuvent être rétablis. Dans de nombreuses régions du monde, cependant, cette séquence ne correspond pas à la réalité. Les conflits sont souvent prolongés, les institutions peuvent être affaiblies ou inexistantes, et les registres fonciers officiels ont parfois disparu. Pourtant, les communautés continuent de cultiver leurs terres, de gérer les forêts, de résoudre les différends et de défendre leurs territoires en s’appuyant sur les systèmes de gouvernance qui restent à leur disposition.

23 July 2026

Blogs

Why land rights can't wait for peace

What if waiting for peace is one of the biggest obstacles to securing land rights? For decades, land governance has largely been treated as part of post-conflict recovery. The assumption has been straightforward: conflict ends, institutions recover, people return home, and only then can land rights be restored. In many parts of the world, however, that sequence does not reflect reality. Conflict is often prolonged, institutions may be weakened or absent, and official land records may have disappeared. Yet communities continue farming, managing forests, resolving disputes, and defending their territories using the governance systems still available to them.

13 July 2026

Brazil

"We are the middle, the beginning and the middle." : Quilombola women in land rights and climate action

Long before a land title is granted or a policy is signed, movements are built. They are built by women and men organising communities, defending territories, passing on ancestral knowledge, protecting culture, and ensuring generations of struggle are never forgotten. Between 10 and 14 June 2026, the III Meeting of CONAQ's Quilombola Women's Collective brought hundreds of these leaders together from across Brazil, alongside representatives from Latin America and Africa. Over five days, they celebrated victories, confronted urgent challenges and strengthened a movement that continues to shape Brazil's conversations on land rights, climate justice, gender equality and historical reparation.