Indigenous-led campaign defends the rights of uncontacted peoples in Peru

By Nicolás Salazar Sutil

The ways in which Indigenous Peoples protect forests continue to be recognised and celebrated throughout the world. But what if a community doing just that faced a political challenge that threatened their very existence?

This was the situation for an estimated 7,500 Indigenous Peoples who live deep within the Peruvian Amazon and have little to no contact with the outside world. Known as Indigenous Peoples in isolation and initial contact (PIACI in Spanish), these communities reside in government-established reserves that span millions of hectares of remote rainforests.

Until last week, a bill introduced by a right-wing congressman and backed by extractive business interests would have transferred decision-making power over PIACI reserves from the federal-level Ministry of Culture to regional agencies. This would have allowed local authorities to cancel existing reserves and halt processes that aim to establish new areas, opening them all up to logging, mining, oil and gas, and other extractive operations.

Photo courtesy of ORPIO.

The threat to PIACI’s was particularly acute in Loreto – a region in northeast Peru bordering Ecuador and Brazil – home to two of the five fully recognised reserves, plus several other proposed reserves. The congressman pushing the reform is from Loreto, and it is here that one of the key flashpoints over the future of PIACI protection is located: the Napo Tigre Reserve.

In response to this, Indigenous organizations like the Regional Organization of Indigenous Peoples of the East (ORPIO in Spanish) mobilised their networks to block the bill. A regional Indigenous federation and a partner of the Tenure Facility, ORPIO publicly denounced the proposed legislation and intensified its cooperation with other organisations.

As ORPIO’s General Secretary Apu Pablo Chota said before the bill was scrapped, we must act to ensure that “the peoples in isolation can live with dignity, accompanied by the sound of their wonderful forest.” He underscored how opening up their reserves would have exposed PIACI communities to violence and disease, thus raising real threats of extermination.

Over the last few months, working in coordination with the national-scale Indigenous rights organisation AIDESEP, ORPIO organised multiple missions to Lima to meet with politicians and push back against the reform bill. In the end, a congressional committee voted to stop the reform from moving forward.

"This is a historic opportunity not only to stop those who wish to destroy the Amazon and its people, but also to ensure the protection of territories for the future."

- Tulio Toche, communication officer at ORPIO

ORPIO’s and others’ work was instrumental in raising public awareness of PIACI rights with well-known climate activists Greta Thunberg and Hollywood actor Mark Ruffalo speaking out against the bill. Yet this is ultimately a victory for the Indigenous Peoples and forests of Peru that grassroots organisations brought out through their own efforts.

“It is vital that the international community and press are made aware of the threats faced by PIACI peoples, because the threat they face has not being debated publicly in our own country,” said Tulio Toche, a communication officer at ORPIO.

Toche also said the vote set a historic precedent in Peru by determining that draft laws affecting the futures of Indigenous communities cannot be presented to Congress without the approval of Indigenous governmental bodies first, and that Congress cannot overrule existing constitutional rights of Indigenous Peoples in accordance with international regulations on the rights of PIACI communities.

The work is not finished

In addition to fighting the draft legislation, ORPIO members believe that it is vital to put an end to forest concessions that have allowed legal and illegal logging in Loreto. “We are talking about 16 million hectares of primary forest across the Peru and Brazil border,” said Apu Miguel Manihuari Tamani, president of the Indigenous Association of Samiria, a member organization of ORPIO. “We have stopped 43 forest concessions. That is a major success for our small organization.”

Yet organizations like ORPIO fear that with the bill now defeated, the international community will focus its attention elsewhere.

“We have worked hard to strengthen their voices, but there is still a lot to do,” Manihuari said. “Health and food security are urgent issues among PIACI communities. We must help our brothers in Yavarí Tapiche (an Indigenous Reserve in Loreto that covers 1.1 million hectares). They need effective support.”

“Now more than ever, we need international support,” Tulio Toche added. “This is a historic opportunity not only to stop those who wish to destroy the Amazon and its people, but also to ensure the protection of territories for the future.”

He said another 4.5 million hectares of land still needs titling to ensure the forest and its peoples can thrive. “Now is the moment when the international community and our grassroots organizations must come together and co-operate. This is an opportunity of a lifetime.”

Articles

04 August 2026

Blogs

Pourquoi les droits fonciers ne peuvent pas attendre la paix

Et si attendre la paix était l’un des plus grands obstacles à la sécurisation des droits fonciers ? Pendant des décennies, la gouvernance foncière a été largement considérée comme un élément de la reconstruction post-conflit. L’hypothèse était simple : le conflit prend fin, les institutions se redressent, les populations rentrent chez elles, et ce n’est qu’alors que les droits fonciers peuvent être rétablis. Dans de nombreuses régions du monde, cependant, cette séquence ne correspond pas à la réalité. Les conflits sont souvent prolongés, les institutions peuvent être affaiblies ou inexistantes, et les registres fonciers officiels ont parfois disparu. Pourtant, les communautés continuent de cultiver leurs terres, de gérer les forêts, de résoudre les différends et de défendre leurs territoires en s’appuyant sur les systèmes de gouvernance qui restent à leur disposition.

23 July 2026

Blogs

Why land rights can't wait for peace

What if waiting for peace is one of the biggest obstacles to securing land rights? For decades, land governance has largely been treated as part of post-conflict recovery. The assumption has been straightforward: conflict ends, institutions recover, people return home, and only then can land rights be restored. In many parts of the world, however, that sequence does not reflect reality. Conflict is often prolonged, institutions may be weakened or absent, and official land records may have disappeared. Yet communities continue farming, managing forests, resolving disputes, and defending their territories using the governance systems still available to them.

13 July 2026

Brazil

"We are the middle, the beginning and the middle." : Quilombola women in land rights and climate action

Long before a land title is granted or a policy is signed, movements are built. They are built by women and men organising communities, defending territories, passing on ancestral knowledge, protecting culture, and ensuring generations of struggle are never forgotten. Between 10 and 14 June 2026, the III Meeting of CONAQ's Quilombola Women's Collective brought hundreds of these leaders together from across Brazil, alongside representatives from Latin America and Africa. Over five days, they celebrated victories, confronted urgent challenges and strengthened a movement that continues to shape Brazil's conversations on land rights, climate justice, gender equality and historical reparation.